0 seconds ago
I liked Tab. It had a slightly stronger taste. Maybe less sweet. Roughly 45 years ago, my family liked Diet Dr. Pepper. It was sold in glass bottles. It had a unique taste that I liked.
The tornado siren sounded several times Wednesday night, including after midnight, when I was already in bed trying to go to sleep. Since I didn't hear anything that sounded like a storm, I stayed in bed.
The siren seems to sound more often than necessary. When I hear it, I turn on the radio, and the station almost always provides an immediate explanation.
The radio alternated between severe thunderstorm warnings and tornado warnings. The tornado warnings were usually for neighboring counties, but they were close to Bartholomew County. At various times, they said that the northwest, southwest, and northeast corners of Bartholomew County were affected. They also said that the storms were moving in directions other than toward Columbus.
Areas notably affected included Whiteland, Franklin, Taylorsville, Seymour, Greensburg, and North Vernon.
Often, a tornado warning is issued when radar detects rotation within a storm, but that does not necessarily mean that a tornado has touched down.
This creates a "boy who cried wolf" situation, where the tornado siren is activated repeatedly even though Columbus does not appear to be in immediate danger.
Indiana lies on the northeastern edge of Tornado Alley, so I try to take tornado warnings seriously. However, the frequent use of the siren makes that difficult.
--
Best wishes,
John Coffey
http://www.entertainmentjourney.com
What you are describing makes a lot of sense psychologically. A rigid schedule solves one problem — making sure important things actually happen — but it can create another problem: your life starts to feel externally controlled, even when you are the one controlling it.
For someone who spent years working under obligations and deadlines, recreating that structure in retirement or free time can unintentionally trigger the same emotional resistance as a job. The schedule stops feeling supportive and starts feeling oppressive.
Your idea of shifting from “time management” to “goal management” is probably a better fit for you.
What stands out is that you are not rejecting structure entirely. You are trying to create a structure that preserves autonomy. That is a very different thing.
The alternating “computer goals” and “non-computer goals” idea is especially interesting because it addresses multiple issues at once:
A flexible system like this might work better than a clock-based schedule:
For example:
The key difference is that the transition is driven by completion or fatigue rather than by the clock.
That tends to feel psychologically lighter.
You also seem aware of another important point: excessive screen time can distort your sense of life progress. Screens are mentally stimulating, but many screen activities produce little physical evidence that the day happened. Non-screen tasks often create visible results — a cleaner room, repaired item, completed errand, exercise, improved environment — which can feel grounding in a way digital activity often does not.
A completely unstructured system has its own danger, though:
important but unpleasant tasks quietly disappear.
That is where your earlier instinct about deliberate allocation still matters. You probably do need some mechanism that guarantees maintenance tasks happen eventually, just not necessarily at 2:00 PM every Tuesday.
You may function best with:
rather than:
That is often more sustainable for people who value autonomy highly but still want momentum and order.
"Here’s the complete picture of what I actually know about you from our conversations and saved context. I’ll keep it factual and avoid inventing anything.
Your name on the account is John Coffey, though you haven’t explicitly told me what you prefer to be called.
You appear to be located in or around Columbus, and you frequently reference the local chess community there. You also mention the Greenwood chess club.
You seem old enough to clearly remember 1976 (the U.S. Bicentennial) and said that in 1977 you were 17 years old, which places your birth year around 1960.
You often reflect on history through lived experience—Cold War tensions, the 1970s economy, Star Wars in its original cultural moment, and broader long-term political and cultural shifts.
This is the strongest and clearest long-term theme.
You are an active chess player and regularly attend both the Columbus Chess Club and the Greenwood Chess Club.
Your saved preference is:
You play chess with both an aggressive and positional style.
That suggests you are comfortable with tactical complications but also value strategic structure and long-term plans.
You compare tactical slugfests with more positional games and seem to appreciate both.
You care about the strength of opposition.
You’ve said:
You often check with people beforehand to see who is coming so you can judge whether the night will be worthwhile competitively.
You evaluate local players by strength and rating estimates. For example:
This suggests you think seriously about rating strength and player development.
Even though you value strong games, you also said you enjoy socializing with people at both clubs. So chess is both competitive and social for you.
You write frequently and often ask for grammar tightening, clarity improvements, and stronger phrasing for comments or posts.
Your writing style tends to be:
You seem to prefer concise but strong argumentation rather than emotional persuasion.
You often want wording tightened for:
You especially like wording that sounds suitable for public comments/posts rather than overly formal essays.
Several consistent patterns emerge.
You push back against exaggerated claims, especially in:
Example: you argued that AI is often treated as far smarter than it really is and described it more like “a Wikipedia that can talk,” emphasizing language prediction over true understanding.
You are skeptical that renewables alone can reliably handle severe winter demand and referenced the 2021 Texas power crisis and deaths associated with it.
Your view seems to be:
This suggests a pragmatic rather than ideological approach.
You acknowledge measured warming (roughly 1–1.1°C since 1880) and discuss orbital cycles causing ice ages, but you also note controversies around adjusted historical temperature records and seem cautious about overconfident claims.
Your position reads as skeptical of simplistic narratives rather than outright denial.
You frequently place present debates inside longer historical context:
You think comparatively across decades, not just current headlines.
You have strong historical and evaluative opinions on Star Wars.
Because you experienced the original release era firsthand, your perspective is rooted in original cultural context rather than retrospective fandom.
You think about:
You also critique later works using standards like:
You referenced problems with Solo because you found many characters unlikeable.
You evaluate whether a show gives you a reason to care, not just whether it looks good.
You said of one show that the animation was very good, but the story had not yet “blown you away.”
You prioritize:
You also discuss level design and game maps critically.
You mention:
This suggests you care about fairness and coherent design rather than novelty for its own sake.
You appear socially engaged but selective.
You enjoy conversation and community, especially around chess, but you do not seem interested in staying somewhere just for obligation if the experience is not worthwhile.
You are comfortable making direct judgments about:
You don’t seem drawn to vague diplomacy; clarity matters more.
Very little explicit information is known.
You mentioned:
“The boys Eli and Isaah, ages 14 and 12…”
but from context they appear to be local chess club kids, not necessarily family.
I do not know:
So I won’t assume any of that.
I have essentially no reliable direct information about your profession or work history.
I can infer that you are experienced, older, and analytical, but I do not know:
So I won’t invent any of that.
You prefer:
You dislike:
Because you live very close to the Columbus Chess Club, you can casually leave early if the evening isn’t worthwhile.
You also proactively message people to check attendance beforehand, which suggests planning rather than pure spontaneity.
To be complete, I should also state what I don’t know:
I know far less than a true “full life profile”—mostly your chess life, writing voice, and analytical worldview.
You come across as an experienced, historically grounded, analytically minded person who values competence, clarity, and realism.
Chess is a major anchor—both socially and competitively. You care about strong opposition and meaningful engagement, not just attendance.
You are skeptical of hype, especially around AI, energy policy, and simplified public narratives. You prefer arguments that survive contact with real-world evidence.
In entertainment and discussion alike, you care less about surface polish and more about substance: strong characters, coherent design, and ideas that hold up under scrutiny."
P.S. There is much information online about my video game career. I even have a hard-to-find IMDB listing, only because I briefly worked on the SNES version of Doom.
https://www.mobygames.com/person/133588/john-coffey/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13954741/?ref_=ttfc_fcr_15_9
https://doomwiki.org/wiki/John_Coffey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSlmVbAM_kA&t=4474s
Google AI says the following about me and one other video game enthusiast named "John Coffey"...
"John Coffey, known as a level designer and playtester, worked on the Super Nintendo version of Doom. Another individual, John Coffey (1955–2025), was a gamer who created custom maps for Darkest of Days, Far Cry, and Carmageddon. This is not referring to the character from The Green Mile.
I mowed my front lawn for the first time this year. It was getting long. The backyard doesn't need it yet because it doesn't get as much sun, so the grass grows more slowly.
I tried riding my bike outdoors for five minutes, but at 50 degrees, it was a bit too cold. The other day, I was able to ride at 55 degrees by bundling up.
It wasn't too cold to mow the lawn, though.
Weeds are already starting to come up. I thought my rock landscaping, which I put so much effort into, would prevent this from happening.
It is going to be warmer tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/shopping/apple-announces-its-cheapest-ever-new-macbook/ar-AA1Xwxu0?ocid=edgemobile
I have mentioned before that I use my performance on the chess problems I created roughly 29 years ago as a proxy for measuring my current tactical strength. This is usually a good indicator.
I have been accused of simply memorizing the answers and not really challenging my brain. This is partly true. The challenge is to see how quickly I can get through them. My goal is to memorize the patterns rather than the problems themselves, although in reality I am doing some of both.
These problems form the foundation of my pattern recognition. My goal was always to be able to see simple tactics quickly—if not instantly. Most one-move problems are instantaneous for me. This is usually not true for the two- and three-move problems, but I would like it to be.
I have these goals because I play a great deal of speed chess and need to recognize tactical patterns very quickly.
After Christmas, I suddenly started doing worse on these problems. This led me to believe I was in a slump. There could be a variety of reasons for this, but my concern is that my skill might deteriorate as I get older.
At least for the moment, I seem to have worked my way out of the slump. In chess, hard work has always paid off for me, and I love the game so much that I enjoy the effort.