Saturday, May 2, 2026
Edward Olmos
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
What ChatGPT knows about me
"Here’s the complete picture of what I actually know about you from our conversations and saved context. I’ll keep it factual and avoid inventing anything.
Core Personal Context
Your name on the account is John Coffey, though you haven’t explicitly told me what you prefer to be called.
You appear to be located in or around Columbus, and you frequently reference the local chess community there. You also mention the Greenwood chess club.
You seem old enough to clearly remember 1976 (the U.S. Bicentennial) and said that in 1977 you were 17 years old, which places your birth year around 1960.
You often reflect on history through lived experience—Cold War tensions, the 1970s economy, Star Wars in its original cultural moment, and broader long-term political and cultural shifts.
Chess
This is the strongest and clearest long-term theme.
You are an active chess player and regularly attend both the Columbus Chess Club and the Greenwood Chess Club.
Playing Style
Your saved preference is:
You play chess with both an aggressive and positional style.
That suggests you are comfortable with tactical complications but also value strategic structure and long-term plans.
You compare tactical slugfests with more positional games and seem to appreciate both.
Competitive Environment
You care about the strength of opposition.
You’ve said:
- You can usually depend on strong players showing up at Greenwood
- At Columbus, strong competition is less consistent
- If the competition level is weak, you may leave early because you live only about 3 minutes away
You often check with people beforehand to see who is coming so you can judge whether the night will be worthwhile competitively.
You evaluate local players by strength and rating estimates. For example:
- You thought Eli (age 14) might be the second-best player in Columbus
- You estimated Omar at at least 1800 strength
This suggests you think seriously about rating strength and player development.
Social Side
Even though you value strong games, you also said you enjoy socializing with people at both clubs. So chess is both competitive and social for you.
Writing / Communication Style
You write frequently and often ask for grammar tightening, clarity improvements, and stronger phrasing for comments or posts.
Your writing style tends to be:
- direct
- analytical
- skeptical of exaggerated claims
- grounded in practical examples
- often debate-oriented
You seem to prefer concise but strong argumentation rather than emotional persuasion.
You often want wording tightened for:
- political commentary
- climate and energy discussions
- AI skepticism
- media criticism
- historical reflection
- personal observations from chess club
You especially like wording that sounds suitable for public comments/posts rather than overly formal essays.
Views and Intellectual Tendencies
Several consistent patterns emerge.
Skeptical of Overstatement
You push back against exaggerated claims, especially in:
- AI discussions
- climate debates
- energy policy
- political rhetoric
Example: you argued that AI is often treated as far smarter than it really is and described it more like “a Wikipedia that can talk,” emphasizing language prediction over true understanding.
Practical Energy Perspective
You are skeptical that renewables alone can reliably handle severe winter demand and referenced the 2021 Texas power crisis and deaths associated with it.
Your view seems to be:
- renewables may be useful and will grow if economical
- backup generation is still necessary
- existing reliable generation should not be discarded carelessly
This suggests a pragmatic rather than ideological approach.
Climate Change Position
You acknowledge measured warming (roughly 1–1.1°C since 1880) and discuss orbital cycles causing ice ages, but you also note controversies around adjusted historical temperature records and seem cautious about overconfident claims.
Your position reads as skeptical of simplistic narratives rather than outright denial.
Historical Framing
You frequently place present debates inside longer historical context:
- Cold War
- WWII memory
- Vietnam/Korea
- economic decline of the 1970s
- cultural meaning of Star Wars in 1977
You think comparatively across decades, not just current headlines.
Entertainment / Media Preferences
Star Wars
You have strong historical and evaluative opinions on Star Wars.
Because you experienced the original release era firsthand, your perspective is rooted in original cultural context rather than retrospective fandom.
You think about:
- why Star Wars resonated in 1977
- how the Cold War shaped interpretation
- the sense of good vs evil in that era
You also critique later works using standards like:
- likeable characters
- story motivation
- emotional investment
You referenced problems with Solo because you found many characters unlikeable.
Animation / Shows
You evaluate whether a show gives you a reason to care, not just whether it looks good.
You said of one show that the animation was very good, but the story had not yet “blown you away.”
You prioritize:
- character likability
- meaningful motivation to keep watching
- narrative engagement over visuals alone
Games / Map Design
You also discuss level design and game maps critically.
You mention:
- frustration with secrets
- gimmicky mechanics
- inaccessible areas that look reachable
- fake affordances like switches that seem meaningful but are not
This suggests you care about fairness and coherent design rather than novelty for its own sake.
Social Style
You appear socially engaged but selective.
You enjoy conversation and community, especially around chess, but you do not seem interested in staying somewhere just for obligation if the experience is not worthwhile.
You are comfortable making direct judgments about:
- people’s strength
- writing quality
- story quality
- policy arguments
You don’t seem drawn to vague diplomacy; clarity matters more.
Family / Relationships
Very little explicit information is known.
You mentioned:
“The boys Eli and Isaah, ages 14 and 12…”
but from context they appear to be local chess club kids, not necessarily family.
I do not know:
- your marital status
- whether you have children
- close family structure
- romantic relationships
So I won’t assume any of that.
Work / Career
I have essentially no reliable direct information about your profession or work history.
I can infer that you are experienced, older, and analytical, but I do not know:
- your occupation
- whether you are retired
- your industry
- education background
So I won’t invent any of that.
Habits and Preferences
Strong Preferences
You prefer:
- precise language
- strong reasoning
- historical context
- competent competition in chess
- likeable characters in fiction
- practical realism over hype
- argument grounded in examples
You dislike:
- exaggerated claims
- gimmicky design
- weak competition when expecting serious chess
- stories without compelling characters
- arguments driven mostly by ideology
Routine Indicators
Because you live very close to the Columbus Chess Club, you can casually leave early if the evening isn’t worthwhile.
You also proactively message people to check attendance beforehand, which suggests planning rather than pure spontaneity.
What I Do Not Know
To be complete, I should also state what I don’t know:
- your job/career
- spouse/partner status
- children/grandchildren
- religion
- political party affiliation
- finances
- health details
- daily routine outside chess and writing
- hobbies beyond what surfaced here
I know far less than a true “full life profile”—mostly your chess life, writing voice, and analytical worldview.
Short Summary
You come across as an experienced, historically grounded, analytically minded person who values competence, clarity, and realism.
Chess is a major anchor—both socially and competitively. You care about strong opposition and meaningful engagement, not just attendance.
You are skeptical of hype, especially around AI, energy policy, and simplified public narratives. You prefer arguments that survive contact with real-world evidence.
In entertainment and discussion alike, you care less about surface polish and more about substance: strong characters, coherent design, and ideas that hold up under scrutiny."
P.S. There is much information online about my video game career. I even have a hard-to-find IMDB listing, only because I briefly worked on the SNES version of Doom.
https://www.mobygames.com/person/133588/john-coffey/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13954741/?ref_=ttfc_fcr_15_9
https://doomwiki.org/wiki/John_Coffey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSlmVbAM_kA&t=4474s
Google AI says the following about me and one other video game enthusiast named "John Coffey"...
"John Coffey, known as a level designer and playtester, worked on the Super Nintendo version of Doom. Another individual, John Coffey (1955–2025), was a gamer who created custom maps for Darkest of Days, Far Cry, and Carmageddon. This is not referring to the character from The Green Mile.
- John Coffey (Developer): A developer involved in porting the classic shooter Doom to the SNES console.
- John Coffey (Map Creator): A community-driven map creator specializing in tactical and custom maps for PC titles.
Monday, April 20, 2026
eufy L60 Robot Vacuum with Self Empty Station
Sunday, April 19, 2026
Manufacturing in the United States
Saturday, March 28, 2026
Lawn
I mowed my front lawn for the first time this year. It was getting long. The backyard doesn't need it yet because it doesn't get as much sun, so the grass grows more slowly.
I tried riding my bike outdoors for five minutes, but at 50 degrees, it was a bit too cold. The other day, I was able to ride at 55 degrees by bundling up.
It wasn't too cold to mow the lawn, though.
Weeds are already starting to come up. I thought my rock landscaping, which I put so much effort into, would prevent this from happening.
It is going to be warmer tomorrow.
Wednesday, March 25, 2026
3D effects
0 seconds ago
4:24 These simple 3D mazes are easy to write; they can even be done in BASIC. I experimented with this kind of maze, but never turned it into a full game. I wrote more complex 3D effects on both the TS1000 and TS2068, but since they were in BASIC, they took forever to render.
On the TS1000, I created a rotating oscilloscope with a 3D projection. I did this on the TS2068 as well. On the TS1000, I was able to animate it by storing 16 screenshots in memory and switching the screen pointer. It looked incredible. On the TS2068, I implemented a kind of ray casting that created a 3D chessboard with an infinite number of squares projected out to the horizon. I also created a 3D pyramid projected in a 2.5D isometric view.
Unfortunately, I sold all of these effects—along with some simple BASIC games—as a product called The Great Game and Graphics Show. It sold well, but in hindsight, it was closer to a demo than a fully realized product. It was 1984, and I was just getting my feet wet writing software for personal computers.
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
I wrote this in 2020
Friday, March 6, 2026
My old house in Salt Lake City
Wednesday, March 4, 2026
Re: Apple’s Cheapest MacBook
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/shopping/apple-announces-its-cheapest-ever-new-macbook/ar-AA1Xwxu0?ocid=edgemobile
Video Games and Retro Gaming
Wednesday, February 25, 2026
Exercise
Monday, February 16, 2026
The Last Farewell ~ Roger Whittaker
Wednesday, January 28, 2026
THE CONFIDENCE LIE WE ALL BELIEVE
Monday, January 26, 2026
Brown Bears
Saturday, January 24, 2026
Variations on the Kanon by Pachelbel - George Winston
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Great result in Chess.com USCF Online rated blitz tournament
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "1"]
[White "clevelandguards"]
[Black "john2001plus"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2211"]
[BlackElo "1758"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "1:07:06 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "john2001plus won by checkmate"]
1. b3 e5 2. Bb2 Nc6 3. e3 d5 4. Bb5 Bd6 5. f4 Qe7 6. Nf3 f6 7. fxe5 fxe5 8.
Bxc6+ bxc6 9. Nxe5 Nf6 10. Nxc6 Qf7 11. Qf3 Bg4 12. Qf2 O-O 13. Bxf6 Qxf6 14.
Qxf6 Rxf6 15. Nd4 c5 16. Nb5 Be5 17. N5c3 d4 18. exd4 cxd4 19. Ne4 d3 20. Nxf6+
Bxf6 21. c3 Re8+ 22. Kf2 Re2+ 23. Kg3 Bf5 24. Na3 Be5+ 25. Kh4 Rxg2 26. Rag1 g5+
27. Kh5 Bg6+ 28. Kh6 Bg7# 0-1
[Event "*** US Chess 3|2 Blitz"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "2"]
[White "SpikyOil2"]
[Black "john2001plus"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2082"]
[BlackElo "1788"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "1:20:36 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "john2001plus won by resignation"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 Ng4 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4
g5 9. Bg3 Bg7 10. Qd2 Qb6 11. Nd5 Qxd4 12. Nc7+ Kd8 13. Nxa8 Qxb2 14. Qa5+ b6
15. Qxb6+ Qxb6 16. Nxb6 Bxa1 17. Bc4 Be6 18. O-O Nd7 19. Bxe6 fxe6 20. Nxd7 Kxd7
21. Rxa1 Rb8 22. h3 Nf6 23. e5 Nd5 24. Rd1 Nc3 25. Rd3 Ne2+ 26. Kf1 Nxg3+ 27.
fxg3 Rb2 28. exd6 Rxa2 29. dxe7+ Kxe7 30. c4 Rc2 31. Ra3 Rxc4 32. Rxa6 Re4 33.
Kf2 Re5 34. Kf3 Kf6 35. g4 Rb5 36. g3 Rb3+ 37. Kf2 Ke5 38. Ra8 Ke4 39. Ra4+ Ke5
40. Ra6 Rb2+ 41. Kf3 Rb3+ 42. Kf2 Rb2+ 43. Kf1 Kf6 44. h4 Ke5 45. Ra5+ Kf6 46.
Kg1 Rb1+ 47. Kf2 Rb2+ 48. Ke3 Rb3+ 49. Ke4 Rxg3 50. hxg5+ hxg5 51. Ra8 Rxg4+ 52.
Kf3 Rf4+ 53. Ke3 e5 54. Rf8+ Kg6 55. Ra8 g4 56. Re8 Kf5 57. Rf8+ Kg5 58. Re8
Rf3+ 59. Ke4 Rf1 60. Rxe5+ Kh4 61. Ra5 Kg3 62. Ke3 Re1+ 63. Kd2 Re7 64. Ra3+ Kg2
65. Kd1 g3 66. Ra2+ Kg1 67. Ra8 g2 68. Rg8 Re5 69. Kd2 Kf2 70. Rf8+ Kg3 71. Rg8+
Kf3 72. Rf8+ Kg4 73. Kd3 g1=Q 74. Rg8+ Rg5 75. Rxg5+ Kxg5 0-1
[Event "*** US Chess 3|2 Blitz"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "3"]
[White "john2001plus"]
[Black "RrabbitHole"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1815"]
[BlackElo "2595"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "1:27:50 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "RrabbitHole won by resignation"]
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. d4 b6 3. g3 Bb7 4. Bg2 e6 5. O-O Be7 6. c4 O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4 8. Qc2
Nxc3 9. bxc3 f5 10. Nd2 Bxg2 11. Kxg2 d5 12. Nf3 dxc4 13. Bf4 Bd6 14. Ne5 Bxe5
15. Bxe5 Nc6 16. Rfd1 Qd5+ 17. Kg1 Nxe5 18. dxe5 Qxe5 19. Rd4 b5 20. f4 Qc5 21.
Kg2 Rad8 22. Rad1 Rd6 23. e4 Rfd8 24. exf5 exf5 25. Qe2 Qc6+ 26. Qf3 Qxf3+ 27.
Kxf3 Rxd4 28. cxd4 c5 29. Ke3 cxd4+ 30. Rxd4 Rxd4 31. Kxd4 Kf7 32. a4 a6 33.
axb5 axb5 0-1
[Event "*** US Chess 3|2 Blitz"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "4"]
[White "TanMiniGoat"]
[Black "john2001plus"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1989"]
[BlackElo "1815"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "1:39:27 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "john2001plus won by checkmate"]
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. e3 d5 4. Bd3 c5 5. b3 Nc6 6. Bb2 Bd6 7. a3 O-O 8. O-O Qc7
9. Nbd2 e5 10. dxe5 Nxe5 11. Nxe5 Bxe5 12. Bxe5 Qxe5 13. Nf3 Qh5 14. c4 dxc4 15.
Bxc4 Bg4 16. Be2 Rfd8 17. Qc2 Qf5 18. Qxf5 Bxf5 19. Rac1 Ne4 20. Bc4 Nd2 21.
Nxd2 Rxd2 22. Rfd1 Rad8 23. Be2 b6 24. Rxd2 Rxd2 25. Rd1 Rxd1+ 26. Bxd1 Kf8 27.
Kf1 Ke7 28. Ke1 Kd6 29. Kd2 b5 30. Bc2 Bxc2 31. Kxc2 Ke5 32. Kc3 g5 33. a4 a6
34. axb5 axb5 35. b4 c4 36. f3 h5 37. g3 g4 38. fxg4 hxg4 39. h4 gxh3 40. g4 h2
41. g5 h1=Q 42. e4 Qxe4 43. g6 fxg6 44. Kb2 Qd3 45. Ka2 c3 46. Ka1 Qd2 47. Kb1
Qb2# 0-1
[Event "*** US Chess 3|2 Blitz"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "5"]
[White "john2001plus"]
[Black "laurengoodkindchess"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[WhiteElo "1837"]
[BlackElo "2050"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "1:50:20 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "Game drawn by repetition"]
1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 c6 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Bg5 Be7 6. e3 Nbd7 7. Bd3 b6 8. O-O
Bb7 9. Qc2 h6 10. Bh4 O-O 11. e4 dxe4 12. Nxe4 Nxe4 13. Bxe7 Qxe7 14. Bxe4 Nf6
15. Bd3 c5 16. d5 exd5 17. Rfe1 Qd6 18. cxd5 Bxd5 19. Rad1 Qc6 20. Ne5 Qb7 21.
f3 Rfe8 22. Bb5 Red8 23. a4 a6 24. Bc4 Bxc4 25. Qxc4 Rac8 26. b3 Qc7 27. Rxd8+
Rxd8 28. Qxa6 Re8 29. Nd3 Rxe1+ 30. Nxe1 Qe5 31. Kf1 Qxh2 32. Qxb6 Nh5 33. Qxc5
Ng3+ 34. Kf2 Nh1+ 35. Ke2 Ng3+ 36. Kf2 Nh1+ 37. Ke2 Ng3+ 38. Kf2 1/2-1/2
[Event "*** US Chess 3|2 Blitz"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "6"]
[White "LilyFlowerBuds"]
[Black "john2001plus"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2352"]
[BlackElo "1845"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "2:02:32 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "LilyFlowerBuds won on time"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. h4 Nc6 7. f3 e6 8. Be3 d5
9. Nxc6 bxc6 10. e5 Nd7 11. Na4 Nxe5 12. Nb6 Rb8 13. Nxc8 Qxc8 14. f4 Nd7 15. b3
Bc5 16. Bxc5 Nxc5 17. Qd4 Ne4 18. Bd3 Qc7 19. Qxg7 Qxf4 20. Qxh8+ Kd7 21. Qd4 e5
22. Qa7+ Ke6 23. Bxe4 Qxe4+ 24. Kd1 Qg4+ 25. Kc1 Qxg2 26. Rd1 Rg8 27. Qc7 d4 28.
Kb2 Rg3 29. Re1 f6 30. Rg1 Qf3 31. Raf1 Qc3+ 32. Kb1 d3 33. Qc8+ Kd5 34. Qd7+
Kc5 35. Qe7+ Kb6 36. Qd8+ Kc5 37. Qf8+ Kb6 38. Qb8+ Kc5 39. Qf8+ Kb6 40. Qd8+
Kc5 41. cxd3 Rxd3 42. Qf8+ Kb6 43. Rc1 Qd4 44. Qb8+ Ka5 45. Qc7+ Kb5 46. Qxc6+
Ka5 47. Qc5+ 1-0
[Event "*** US Chess 3|2 Blitz"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2026.01.14"]
[Round "7"]
[White "VroomVroom5"]
[Black "john2001plus"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2081"]
[BlackElo "1843"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]
[EndTime "2:13:35 GMT+0000"]
[Termination "john2001plus won by resignation"]
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 d5 5. e3 O-O 6. Nf3 c5 7. Bd2 cxd4 8. Nxd4
Nc6 9. Nxc6 bxc6 10. Be2 e5 11. O-O d4 12. exd4 exd4 13. Na4 Qa5 14. Bxb4 Qxb4
15. a3 Qd6 16. b4 Re8 17. Bf3 Ng4 18. g3 Ne5 19. Bg2 d3 20. Qc3 Bg4 21. f3 Bf5
22. f4 Ng4 23. Nc5 Ne3 24. Rfd1 Nxd1 25. Rxd1 a5 26. Nxd3 axb4 27. axb4 Re3 28.
c5 Rxd3 29. cxd6 Rxc3 30. d7 Rd8 31. Ra1 Bxd7 32. Bf1 Kf8 33. b5 cxb5 34. Ra7
Ke8 35. g4 b4 36. f5 b3 37. Ra5 b2 38. Re5+ Kf8 39. Bd3 Rxd3 0-1
Final rating: 1866
Monday, January 12, 2026
My blogs get many hits
Name one thing
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Early chess programs
From: John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 11:45 AM
Subject:
To: Jeff Chronologically Gaming
Fwd: My Chess Tactics problems.
From: John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 10:53 AM
Subject: My Chess Tactics problems.
To:
I have mentioned before that I use my performance on the chess problems I created roughly 29 years ago as a proxy for measuring my current tactical strength. This is usually a good indicator.
I have been accused of simply memorizing the answers and not really challenging my brain. This is partly true. The challenge is to see how quickly I can get through them. My goal is to memorize the patterns rather than the problems themselves, although in reality I am doing some of both.
These problems form the foundation of my pattern recognition. My goal was always to be able to see simple tactics quickly—if not instantly. Most one-move problems are instantaneous for me. This is usually not true for the two- and three-move problems, but I would like it to be.
I have these goals because I play a great deal of speed chess and need to recognize tactical patterns very quickly.
After Christmas, I suddenly started doing worse on these problems. This led me to believe I was in a slump. There could be a variety of reasons for this, but my concern is that my skill might deteriorate as I get older.
At least for the moment, I seem to have worked my way out of the slump. In chess, hard work has always paid off for me, and I love the game so much that I enjoy the effort.